>> I THINK IT WENT VERY WELL.
YOU HEARD IT YOURSELF, THIS IS A
CASE NOBODY WANTED TO BRING.
LOOKING BACK, IT GOES BACK MANY
YEARS, 2013 AND BEFORE THAT.
IT IS A CASE AS TO BOOKKEEPING
WHICH IS A VERY MINOR THING IN
TERMS OF ALL THE CRIME GOING ON
OUTSIDE AS WE SPEAK, RIGHT
OUTSIDE AS WE SPEAK.
THIS IS A CASE WHERE YOU PAY A
LAWYER AND THEY CALL IT A LEGAL
EXPENSE. THAT IS THE EXACT TERM THEY USE,
LEGAL EXPENSE, IN THE BOOKS.
ANOTHER THING THAT WAS NOT EVEN
SAID IS THEY NEVER DEDUCTED IT
AS A TAX DEDUCTION.
MOST PEOPLE WANT TO DEDUCT
EVERYTHING.
[INDISCERNIBLE]
THEY CALL A PAYMENT TO A LAWYER
A LEGAL EXPENSE IN THE BOOKS.
THEY CALLED IT A PAYMENT TO A
LAWYER.
HE IS A LAW YOUR.
REPRESENTED A LOT OF PEOPLE OVER THE YEARS.
I AM NOT THE ONLY ONE.
WAS NOT VERY GOOD IN A LOT OF
WAYS IN TERMS OF HIS
REPRESENTATION PRETTY
REPRESENTED A LOT OF PEOPLE.
HE PUTS IN AN INVOICE OR
WHATEVER, A BILL, AND THEY PAY
IT.
THEY CALL IT A LEGAL EXPENSE.
NOBODY HAD BEEN ABLE TO SAY WHAT
YOU ARE SUPPOSED TO CALL IT.
WHEN A LAWYER PUTS IN A BILL OR
INVOICE AND YOU PAY THE BILL AND
THERE IS A VERY SMALL LITTLE
LINE.
THEY MARK IT DOWN AS A LEGAL
EXPENSE.
I GOT INDICTED.
I AM DELETING CANDIDATE.
I AM BEATING BIDEN.
I AM LEADING THE REPUBLICANS.
I HAVE THE NOMINATION.
THIS IS WHAT THEY TRY TO TAKE ME
OFF THE TRAIL FOR.
CHECKS BEING PAID TO A LAWYER,
WAS A LAWYER.
THE THING HE GOT IN TROUBLE
FORWARD THINGS THAT HAD NOTHING
TO DO WITH ME.
HE WENT TO JAIL.
THIS HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH ME
PUT THIS HAD TO DO WITH THE
COMPANY HE OWNED WHICH IS
SOMETHING HE OWNED.
IT HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH ME.
HE REPRESENTED A LOT OF PEOPLE
OVER THE YEARS.
BUT THEY TAKE THIS PAYMENT AND
THEY CALL IT A LEGAL EXPENSE.
THIS IS WHAT I GOT INDICTED ON.
THIS TAKES ME OFF THE CAMPAIGN
TRAIL. I SHOULD BE IN GEORGIA NOW.
I SHOULD BE IN A LOT OF
DIFFERENT PLACES RIGHT NOW CAMPAIGNING.
I AM SITTING HERE.
THIS WILL GO ON FOR A LONG TIME.
IT IS VERY UNFAIR.
IT IS VERY UNFAIR WHAT IS GOING
ON.
I SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO CAMPAIGN.
WHOEVER HEARD OF THIS?
YOU GOT INDICTED FOR THAT?
PEOPLE SAY THEY CANNOT BELIEVE IT.
THE OTHER THING IS IF THIS WAS
SUCH A GREAT CASE, WHY DID THE
SOUTHERN DISTRICT TURN IT DOWN?
WHY DID NUMEROUS OTHER AGENCIES
AND LAW ENFORCEMENT GROUPS LOOK
AT IT?
IT WOULD SHOW EVERYBODY.
MORE IMPORTANTLY, WHY DID
FEDERAL ELECTIONS NOT DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT.
IT IS FEDERAL.
THEY TRIED TO MAKE IT A STATE
CASE.
IT IS NOT A STATE CASE.
IT NEVER HAPPENED BEFORE.
THIS HAS NEVER HAPPENED BEFORE
WHERE THE STATE TRIES TO INSERT
ITSELF IN FEDERAL ELECTIONS.
NOBODY HAS EVER SEEN IT.
THEY SAID ESSENTIALLY NOTHING
WAS DONE WRONG OR THEY WOULD
HAVE DONE SOMETHING ABOUT IT.
THEY WOULD HAVE DONE SOMETHING
ABOUT IT.
BUT THEY SAID NOTHING.
THEY SAID WE PASSED.
THEY COULD NOT EVEN BELIEVE IT.
THEY WERE INCREDULOUS.
WHEN HE FIRST CAME IN, HE DID
NOT WANT TO DEAL WITH IT.
HE DID NOT WANT TO DO IT.
LOOK AT WHAT POMERANTZ DID.
THAT IS BAD STUFF.
LOOK AT THE LAST TRIAL.
HE GOT CAUGHT LYING.
WHEN ARE THEY GOING TO LOOK AT
THAT?
JUST A FEW BLOCKS AWAY, THEY HAD
A TRIAL WITH LETITIA JAMES.
IT IS ALL COMING OUT OF THE
WHITE HOUSE, BY THE WAY.
THE JUDGE DID NOT KNOW ANYTHING.
HE SAYS SUPPOSING IT GOES DOWN.
IT DOES NOT GO DOWN.
I PUT UP $175 MILLION IN CASH.
WE HAVE A BONDING COMPANY.
THEY TELL HIM THE BONDING
COMPANY IS NOT GOOD.
THEY ALSO HAVE $175 MILLION IN
COLLATERAL.
THE JUDGE DID NOT KNOW ANYTHING
ABOUT IT.
HE DID NOT KNOW WHAT THE $175
MILLION CATCHMENT.
HE HAD NO IDEA WHAT ANYTHING
MEANT.
HE CHARGED ME HUNDREDS OF
MILLIONS OF DOLLARS FOR SOMEBODY
TOTALLY INNOCENT. IF YOU LOOK AT WHAT HAPPENED
TODAY, IT SHOULD HAVE GONE TO
THE BUSINESS DIVISION.
IF YOU LOOK AT THE NUMBERS, THEY
ARE UNDERESTIMATED, I
UNDERESTIMATED. IT IS THE OPPOSITE OF WHAT THEY
SAID.
THEY DID IT FOR THEIR OWN
NARRATIVE.
THEY VALUED OTHER ASSETS TO
BUILD THE NARRATIVE.
I HAVE A COMPLETE RECORD OF WHAT
HAPPENED.
HE HAD NO IDEA WHAT WAS GOING
ON. DID NOT UNDERSTAND THE MOST
SIMPLE CONTEXT. THIS IS THE MAN THAT TOOK A
CASE.
THEY ARE MOVING OUT OF NEW YORK
BECAUSE THEY WILL BE PUT OUT OF
BUSINESS.
THEY ARE MOVING OUT OF NEW YORK
BECAUSE IT.
THE JUDGE HAD ABSOLUTELY NO IDEA
WHAT HAPPENED.
HE SAID, WHAT HAPPENS IF IT GOES
UP OR DOWN? THEY SAID IT DOES NOT.
WE PUT UP ALL-CASH.
THE DEAL WAS APPROVED WITH THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL, IF YOU CAN
BELIEVE THAT. THE DEAL WAS APPROVED.
SHE JUST TRIED TO EMBARRASS
EVERYBODY.
SHE TRIED TO EMBARRASS A VERY GOOD BONDING COMPANY BY SAYING
THEY WERE NOT CREDIT WORTHY.
THEY WERE CREDIT WORTHY.
WHAT IS MORE IMPORTANT IS THEY
HAD THE 175 MILLION DOLLARS I
PUT UP.
THE POINT IS THEY HAD NO IDEA
WHAT WAS HAPPENING.
THIS IS THE SAME JUDGE THAT MADE
A RULING THAT SHOOK THE WORLD,
IT SHOOK THE WORLD.
EVERYONE KNOWS DURING THE TRIAL,
I DID NOTHING WRONG.
AND HERE, I DID NOTHING WRONG
ALSO. THIS IS A WITCH HUNT TO KEEP ME
OFF THE CAMPAIGN TRAIL.
SO FAR, IT IS NOT WORKING
BECAUSE THE PUBLIC UNDERSTANDS IT IS A WITCH HUNT.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
>> [INDISCERNIBLE]
YOUNG PEOPLE FOR CAREERS IN THE RENEWABLE
ENERGY SECTOR.
>> ♪ [" POMP AND
CIRCUMSTANCE"] ♪
>> HELLO, HELLO, HELLO!
[APPLAUSE]
>> THANK YOU FOR SHARING YOUR
STORY